Falls ex rel. Falls v. Williams
261 N.C. 413
This text of 261 N.C. 413 (Falls ex rel. Falls v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Falls ex rel. Falls v. Williams, 261 N.C. 413 (N.C. 1964).
Opinion
A careful examination of the evidence convinces us the case should have been submitted to the jury on appropriate issues. How the conflicts in the testimony should be resolved is a matter for the jury — not the court. A detailed discussion of the evidence presently be[414]*414fore us is not appropriate. Sprueill v. Hamlet, 260, N.C. 546, 133 S.E. 2d 173.
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sprueill v. Hamlet
133 S.E.2d 173 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
261 N.C. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falls-ex-rel-falls-v-williams-nc-1964.