SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORP. v. Silva

960 S.W.2d 654, 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 149, 1997 Tex. LEXIS 120, 1997 WL 751567
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1997·No. 97-0848·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam

We deny Spohn’s application for writ of error because Spohn failed to present conclusive summary judgment proof that the attack in question occurred off its property. Since this was the only ground Spohn presented, summary judgment was improper on this record. However, we note the court of appeals held:

The very proximity of the curb upon which [Silva] was stabbed to [Spohn’s] property raises a factual issue as to [Spohn’s] power to control and expel third-party wrongdoers.

951 S.W.2d at 96. We disapprove of this holding and the opinion to the extent that it implies that under Texas law a person has control of non-owned premises merely because that person owns the adjacent property-

HANKINSON, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORP. v. Silva, 960 S.W.2d 654, 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 149, 1997 Tex. LEXIS 120, 1997 WL 751567 (Tex. 1997).

960 S.W.2d 654 (SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORP. v. Silva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related