Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC
This text of 3 F. App'x 54 (Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stanley and Rose Spitzer appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC, 140 F.Supp.2d 562 (E.D.N.C.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 F. App'x 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spitzer-v-trans-union-llc-ca4-2001.