Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC

3 F. App'x 54
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2001·No. No. 00-2079·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley and Rose Spitzer appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC, 140 F.Supp.2d 562 (E.D.N.C.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC, 3 F. App'x 54 (4th Cir. 2001).

3 F. App'x 54 (Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Trans Union, LLC
526 F. Supp. 2d 577 (W.D. North Carolina, 2007)
Joiner v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.
467 F. Supp. 2d 508 (W.D. North Carolina, 2006)