Spina v. Melvin

289 A.D.2d 956, 735 N.Y.S.2d 441, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12489
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Although defendant met his initial burden on the motion, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact by her own affidavit and that of her treating chiropractor (see, Rodriguez v Duggan, 266 AD2d 859; see also, Moreno v Delcid, 262 AD2d 464, 465; Nathanson v David, 244 AD2d 930). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spina v. Melvin, 289 A.D.2d 956, 735 N.Y.S.2d 441, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 956 (Spina v. Melvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nitti v. Clerrico
291 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)