Rodriguez v. Duggan

266 A.D.2d 859, 697 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden of establishing that Maria Rodriguez (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious physical injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiffs raised an issue of fact, however, by the affidavit of plaintiffs chiropractor, who stated that he measured significant restrictions in the flexion, extension and rotation of [860]*860plaintiffs cervical spine 11 months after the accident and opined that those restrictions are permanent (see, Nathanson v David, 244 AD2d 930). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dillon, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Duggan, 266 A.D.2d 859, 697 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 859 (Rodriguez v. Duggan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STRANGIO, ANNA v. VASQUEZ, T.M. MAGADDINO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Strangio v. Vasquez
144 A.D.3d 1579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Spina v. Melvin
289 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Testa v. Allen
289 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Dixon v. LaMorticella
286 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Mangano v. Sherman
273 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)