Spiess v. Johnson
This text of 765 P.2d 811 (Spiess v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lowell SPIESS, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent On Review,
v.
Richard H. JOHNSON, M.D., and Richard H. Johnson, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner On Review,
Terrell Templeman, Bruce S. Barnes, Dba Pendleton Professional Services, Respondents On Review, and
Alta M. Case, Defendant (below).
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc[*].
Theodore H. Heap, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner/cross-respondent on review.
*812 Thomas M. Christ, Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for respondent/cross-petitioner on review Richard H. Johnson, M.D.
Don G. Swink, Portland, argued the cause for respondents on review Terrell Templeman and Bruce S. Barnes, d/b/a Pendleton Professional Services.
Affirmed by an equally divided court.
NOTES
[*] Lent, J., retired effective Sept. 30, 1988.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
765 P.2d 811, 307 Or. 242, 1988 Ore. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiess-v-johnson-or-1988.