Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc.
654 F.2d 302, 26 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1017, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18668, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,210
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 7, 1981·No. No. 79-2382·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
A member of this Administrative Unit of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Administrative Unit in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Administrative Unit of the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc., 654 F.2d 302, 26 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1017, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18668, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,210 (5th Cir. 1981).
654 F.2d 302 (Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phuong v. National Academy of Sciences
927 F. Supp. 487 (District of Columbia, 1996)