26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1017, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,210 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America) Inc.

654 F.2d 302
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 7, 1981
Docket79-2382
StatusPublished

This text of 654 F.2d 302 (26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1017, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,210 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America) Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1017, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,210 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America) Inc., 654 F.2d 302 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

654 F.2d 302

26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1017,
27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,210
Michael E. SPIESS, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree,
Plaintiffs- Appellees,
v.
C. ITOH & COMPANY (AMERICA) INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 79-2382.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Unit A

Aug. 7, 1981.

Fulbright & Jaworski, Neil Martin, Nancy Morrison O'Connor, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Porter & Clements, Edward John O'Neill, Jr., Charles E. Humphrey, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Lutz Alexander Prager, Marcia Beth Ruskin, E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 24, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981, 643 F.2d 353).

Before BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Administrative Unit of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Administrative Unit in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Administrative Unit of the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc.
654 F.2d 302 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F.2d 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/26-fair-emplpraccas-1017-27-empl-prac-dec-p-32210-michael-e-ca5-1981.