Spiegel v. Gnadzinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiegel v. Gnadzinski

155 A.D.2d 900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1989

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 900 (Spiegel v. Gnadzinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiegel v. Gnadzinski, 155 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal dismissed as moot without costs. Same memorandum as in Spiegel v Gnadzinski ([appeal No. 1] 155 AD2d 899 [decided herewith]).

All concur, except Boomer and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm, in same dissenting memorandum as in Spiegel v Gnadzinski (supra). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. — summary judgment.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal dismissed as moot without costs. Same memorandum as in Spiegel v Gnadzinski ([appeal No. 1] 155 AD2d 899 [decided herewith]).

All concur, except Boomer and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm, in same dissenting memorandum as in Spiegel v Gnadzinski (supra). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. — summary judgment.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.D.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegel-v-gnadzinski-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack