Spiegal v. Zimmer Biomet Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJuly 12, 2019
Docket1:19-cv-06567
StatusUnknown

This text of Spiegal v. Zimmer Biomet Inc. (Spiegal v. Zimmer Biomet Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spiegal v. Zimmer Biomet Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jul 12, 2019

IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2859

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -17)

On October 3, 2018, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 340 F.Supp.3d 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 41 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Paul A. Crotty. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Crotty. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Paul A. Crotty. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is Syringe Kh. CBN CLERK S OFFICE John W. Nichols MULTDISTRICT ON Clerk of the Panel A CERTIFIED COPY RUBY'J. KRAJICK, CLERK ov Shartor/dnas Teer ater fayel-

IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2859

SCHEDULE CTO~-17 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST Div. CANO, CASE CAPTION

ALASKA AK 3-19-0016! White et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 19--00937 Spiegal et al v. Zimmer Biomet Inc. et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Zimmer
340 F. Supp. 3d 1379 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Spiegal v. Zimmer Biomet Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegal-v-zimmer-biomet-inc-nysd-2019.