Sperling v. Stubblefield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sperling v. Stubblefield

83 Mo. App. 266, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 162

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 Mo. App. 266 (Sperling v. Stubblefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sperling v. Stubblefield, 83 Mo. App. 266, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 162 (Mo. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

BIGGS, J.

This is an action for tbe conversion of personal property. Tbe jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, but tbe record fails to show that a judgment was entered on tbe verdict. There being no judgment, there could be no appeal. Silvey v. Sumner, 51 Mo. 199; Dale v. Copple, 53 Mo. 321. It is not sufficient that the bill of exceptions recites that a judgment was rendered. Tbe judgment must appear in tbe record. In re Spencer, 61 Mo. 375. Tbe cause will be stricken from tbe docket.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIGGS, J.

This is an action for tbe conversion of personal property. Tbe jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, but tbe record fails to show that a judgment was entered on tbe verdict. There being no judgment, there could be no appeal. Silvey v. Sumner, 51 Mo. 199; Dale v. Copple, 53 Mo. 321. It is not sufficient that the bill of exceptions recites that a judgment was rendered. Tbe judgment must appear in tbe record. In re Spencer, 61 Mo. 375. Tbe cause will be stricken from tbe docket.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Mo. App. 266, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperling-v-stubblefield-moctapp-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack