Dale v. Copple
53 Mo. 321
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action of trespass for cutting down the timber of plaintiff', William Dale; brought by him against the road overseer, William H. Anderson, and a number of other defendants. The record shows that a verdict was returned [322]*322for the plaintiff, in the usual form, and then this language is used: “ Whereupon, the court ordered judgment to be en-
tered accordingly.” But no judgment is actually entered, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dale v. Copple, 53 Mo. 321 (Mo. 1873).
53 Mo. 321 (Dale v. Copple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lowe v. Frede
167 S.W. 443 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
Freeman v. McCrite
147 S.W. 1102 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
State ex rel. Wabash Railroad v. Ryan
90 S.W. 418 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
State v. Wealaka M. & M. Co.
87 S.W. 464 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Reesman v. Rollinson
82 S.W. 646 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Sperling v. Stubblefield
83 Mo. App. 266 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
State v. Wymer
79 Mo. 277 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
People v. Gaines
52 Cal. 479 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Price v. Brown
63 Mo. 347 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)
In re Spencer
61 Mo. 375 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)