Dale v. Copple

Supreme Court of Missouri

Dale v. Copple

53 Mo. 321

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedAugust 15, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 53 Mo. 321 (Dale v. Copple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dale v. Copple, 53 Mo. 321 (Mo. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of trespass for cutting down the timber of plaintiff', William Dale; brought by him against the road overseer, William H. Anderson, and a number of other defendants. The record shows that a verdict was returned [322]*322for the plaintiff, in the usual form, and then this language is used: “ Whereupon, the court ordered judgment to be en-

tered accordingly.” But no judgment is actually entered, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Judges Adams and Tories concur; Judges Wagner and Napton absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of trespass for cutting down the timber of plaintiff', William Dale; brought by him against the road overseer, William H. Anderson, and a number of other defendants. The record shows that a verdict was returned [322]*322for the plaintiff, in the usual form, and then this language is used: “ Whereupon, the court ordered judgment to be en-

tered accordingly.” But no judgment is actually entered, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Judges Adams and Tories concur; Judges Wagner and Napton absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Mo. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-copple-mo-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack