Sperdutto v. United States
This text of 246 F.2d 729 (Sperdutto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. The contention that counts for sale of counterfeit cur[730]*730rency and for conspiracy stated but a single offense precluding separate consecutive sentences was answered in the denial of rehearing, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 436, on the original affirmance of petitioner’s conviction in United States v. Farina, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 18, certiorari denied Farina v. United States, 340 U.S. 875, 71 S.Ct. 121, 95 L.Ed. 636, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 928, 71 S.Ct. 795, 95 L.Ed. 1359; see also Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1130, 90 L.Ed. 1489, rehearing denied 329 U.S. 818, 67 S.Ct. 26, 91 L.Ed. 697.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 F.2d 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperdutto-v-united-states-ca2-1957.