Daniel Sperdutto v. United States
This text of 246 F.2d 729 (Daniel Sperdutto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Daniel SPERDUTTO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 389.
Docket 24639.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 10, 1957.
Decided July 5, 1957.
Allen S. Stim, New York City, for petioner-appellant.
Alan W. Richenaker, Asst. U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and CHASE and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed. The contention that counts for sale of counterfeit currency and for conspiracy stated but a single offense precluding separate consecutive sentences was answered in the denial of rehearing, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 436, on the original affirmance of petitioner's conviction in United States v. Farina, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 18, certiorari denied Farina v. United States, 340 U.S. 875, 71 S.Ct. 121, 95 L.Ed. 636, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 928, 71 S.Ct. 795, 95 L. Ed. 1359; see also Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489, rehearing denied 329 U.S. 818, 67 S.Ct. 26, 91 L.Ed. 697.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 F.2d 729, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-sperdutto-v-united-states-ca2-1957.