Daniel Sperdutto v. United States

246 F.2d 729, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3625
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 5, 1957·No. 24639·Published

Opinion

246 F.2d 729

Daniel SPERDUTTO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 389.

Docket 24639.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1957.

Decided July 5, 1957.

Allen S. Stim, New York City, for petioner-appellant.

Alan W. Richenaker, Asst. U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and CHASE and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed. The contention that counts for sale of counterfeit currency and for conspiracy stated but a single offense precluding separate consecutive sentences was answered in the denial of rehearing, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 436, on the original affirmance of petitioner's conviction in United States v. Farina, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 18, certiorari denied Farina v. United States, 340 U.S. 875, 71 S.Ct. 121, 95 L.Ed. 636, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 928, 71 S.Ct. 795, 95 L. Ed. 1359; see also Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489, rehearing denied 329 U.S. 818, 67 S.Ct. 26, 91 L.Ed. 697.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Sperdutto v. United States, 246 F.2d 729, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3625 (2d Cir. 1957).

246 F.2d 729 (Daniel Sperdutto v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinkerton v. United States
328 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1946)
United States v. Farina
184 F.2d 18 (Second Circuit, 1950)
United States v. Farina
193 F.2d 436 (Second Circuit, 1951)
Sperdutto v. United States
246 F.2d 729 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United States
329 U.S. 817 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Farina v. United States
340 U.S. 875 (Supreme Court, 1950)