Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Spencer v. Miller

Spencer v. Miller

159 S.E. 144, 43 Ga. App. 426, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 402
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1931
Docket21461
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 S.E. 144 (Spencer v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spencer v. Miller, 159 S.E. 144, 43 Ga. App. 426, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 402 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based upon .the usual general grounds, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. M. B. Buhantes, for plaintiff in error. . Porter & Mebane, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pridgen v. Carolina Coach Co.
47 S.E.2d 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 144, 43 Ga. App. 426, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-miller-gactapp-1931.