Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission

Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission

124 So. 3d 428, 2013 WL 5848589, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17314
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-3556
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 3d 428 (Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission, 124 So. 3d 428, 2013 WL 5848589, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the circuit court’s issuance of an order to show cause why the petition pending below should not be granted, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the authority of Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Petitioner’s motion requesting that the court treat his petition for writ of mandamus as seeking certiorari review of the circuit court’s order to show cause is denied.

LEWIS, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 3d 428, 2013 WL 5848589, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2013.