Special Disability Trust Fund, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Motor & Compressor Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Special Disability Trust Fund, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Motor & Compressor Co.

417 So. 2d 1151, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20869

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 11, 1982

DocketNo. AJ-215

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 1151 (Special Disability Trust Fund, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Motor & Compressor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Special Disability Trust Fund, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Motor & Compressor Co., 417 So. 2d 1151, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20869 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Special Disability Trust Fund seeks to appeal a workers’ compensation order finding that the employer/carrier was entitled to reimbursement for rehabilitation benefits paid on claimant’s behalf, but reserving “jurisdiction for the determination of any further matters related to the issues determined herein.” The order further indicates that the amount of reimbursement will be determined at a later date. Since this order is non-final, in that it fails to dispose of all matters ripe for determination and not stipulated between the parties, we conclude that we are without jurisdiction over this appeal. See Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 7 F.L.W. 1330 (Fla. 1st DCA, Case No. AG-291, June 18, 1982); The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813, (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to review of the order in the event of an appeal from a final order awarding reimbursement.

MILLS, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Special Disability Trust Fund seeks to appeal a workers’ compensation order finding that the employer/carrier was entitled to reimbursement for rehabilitation benefits paid on claimant’s behalf, but reserving “jurisdiction for the determination of any further matters related to the issues determined herein.” The order further indicates that the amount of reimbursement will be determined at a later date. Since this order is non-final, in that it fails to dispose of all matters ripe for determination and not stipulated between the parties, we conclude that we are without jurisdiction over this appeal. See Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 7 F.L.W. 1330 (Fla. 1st DCA, Case No. AG-291, June 18, 1982); The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813, (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to review of the order in the event of an appeal from a final order awarding reimbursement.

MILLS, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 So. 2d 1151, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/special-disability-trust-fund-department-of-labor-employment-security-v-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack