Spear v. Tinkham

2 Barb. Ch. 105
New York Court of Chancery·Decided January 25, 1847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

said the vice chancellor had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from surrogates, in any case, under the provisions of the revised statutes. And that an order of the chancellor,, referring an appeal of that nature to a vice chancellor, would not confer any jurisdiction upon the latter.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spear v. Tinkham, 2 Barb. Ch. 105 (N.Y. 1847).

2 Barb. Ch. 105 (Spear v. Tinkham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarbel v. Bradley
7 Abb. N. Cas. 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)