Spear v. Tinkham
2 Barb. Ch. 105
This text of 2 Barb. Ch. 105 (Spear v. Tinkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spear v. Tinkham, 2 Barb. Ch. 105 (N.Y. 1847).
Opinion
said the vice chancellor had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from surrogates, in any case, under the provisions of the revised statutes. And that an order of the chancellor,, referring an appeal of that nature to a vice chancellor, would not confer any jurisdiction upon the latter.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tarbel v. Bradley
7 Abb. N. Cas. 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Barb. Ch. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spear-v-tinkham-nychanct-1847.