Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co.

75 S.E. 135, 138 Ga. 316, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 291

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1912·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

This is a motion to set aside a judgment rendered in the absence of the defendant and her attorney, and to reinstate the ease. The evidence before the judge was sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was lacking in diligence, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment and reinstate the case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. DuPont Guerry and A. L. Dasher, for plaintiff in error. Hall & Hall, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, P. J.

This is a motion to set aside a judgment rendered in the absence of the defendant and her attorney, and to reinstate the ease. The evidence before the judge was sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was lacking in diligence, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment and reinstate the case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. DuPont Guerry and A. L. Dasher, for plaintiff in error. Hall & Hall, contra.

Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co., 75 S.E. 135, 138 Ga. 316, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 291 (Ga. 1912).

Pincite

75 S.E. 135 (Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related