Williams v. Swift & Co.
111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 441, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 583
This text of 111 S.E. 704 (Williams v. Swift & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Swift & Co., 111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 441, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 583 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
This was a suit on three promissory notes, and, under the facts of the ease, it was not error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiil' for the full amount sued for, less attorney’s fees, or thereafter to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 441, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-swift-co-gactapp-1922.