Williams v. Swift & Co.

111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 441, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 583
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1922·No. 13212·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This was a suit on three promissory notes, and, under the facts of the ease, it was not error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiil' for the full amount sued for, less attorney’s fees, or thereafter to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Swift & Co., 111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 441, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 583 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 704 (Williams v. Swift & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.