S.P. v. State
677 So. 2d 109, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8053, 1996 WL 426374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S.P. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611 →
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s convictions for armed robbery and armed burglary, finding no merit in the argument raised on appeal. However, as the state concedes error, we reverse and remand in order to permit the trial court to specify in its disposition order the offense or offenses which it determined the juvenile to have committed pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(i).
Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
S.P. v. State, 677 So. 2d 109, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8053, 1996 WL 426374 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
677 So. 2d 109 (S.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.