S.P. v. State
676 So. 2d 1065, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7830, 1996 WL 411253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S.P. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12611 →
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s delinquency disposition order as the record fails to reflect compliance with the requirement of section 39.052, Florida Statutes, that the court set forth, on the record or in writing, reasons for the adjudication and commitment. D.D.M. v. State, 662 So.2d 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); M.S.M. v. State, 639 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); P.D.W. v. State, 621 So.2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). In all other respects, we affirm. We remand for a new disposition hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
S.P. v. State, 676 So. 2d 1065, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7830, 1996 WL 411253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
676 So. 2d 1065 (S.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
P.D.W. v. State
621 So. 2d 739 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
M.S.M. v. State
639 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
D.D.M. v. State
662 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)