Sowell v. The New York City Police Department

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RANDY SOWELL, Plaintiff, 23-CV-5348 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated June 10, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against the City of New York are dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). To the extent Plaintiff sought to bring claims of against individual NYPD officers, such claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge