Sowell v. Kelly

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 28, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-05354
StatusUnknown

This text of Sowell v. Kelly (Sowell v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sowell v. Kelly, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RANDY SOWELL, Plaintiff, 23-CV-5354 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION AND PRISONER CAPTAIN KELLY, et al., AUTHORIZATION Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated at Vernon C. Bain Center, brings this action pro se.1 To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a prisoner must either pay $402.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner’s IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to collect the $350.00 filing fee

1 Plaintiff filed this action on August 1, 2022. See Sowell v Annucci, ECF 1:22-CV-6538, 1 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 1, 2022). By order dated January 13, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff to amend his complaint, (id. at ECF No. 6), and on February 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against (1) Acting Commissioner Annucci; (2) former Commissioner Brann; (3) S.P.O. Brown; (4) Eric Shenkus, (5) Megan Donnovan, and (6) Kathrin S. Weigel ‒ attorneys from Cape May, New Jersey, Public Defender Office; (7) Emily Buonadonna, an assistant prosecutor from the Cape May Prosecutor’s Office; (8) the Cape May Courthouse; (9) the New York City Department of Homeless Services (DHS); (10) Captain Kelly, (11) Officer Guzman, (12) Deputy Warden Harvey, (13) Officer Caruso, (14) Captain Smart, and (15) Deputy Warden Leiter ‒ correction officials assigned to Rikers Island; (16) New York City Department of Correction (DOC); (17) New York State Department of Corrections and Community Services (DOCCS); (18) the New York Police Department (NYPD); (19) “Public Assistance Office 14th Street”; and (20) the New York City Housing Authority Albany Houses, (id. at ECF No. 8). By order dated June 22, 2023, the Court severed the claims against DOC correction staff for allegedly unlawful conditions of confinement and retaliatory acts at DOC’s facilities, in which Plaintiff names Captain Kelly, Officer Guzman, Deputy Warden Harvey, Officer Caruso, Captain Smart, Deputy Warden Leiter, and DOC as defendants. (Id. at ECF No. 11.) in installments deducted from the prisoner’s account.2 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees must therefore authorize the Court to withdraw these payments from his account by filing a “prisoner authorization,” which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee from the prisoner’s

account in installments and to send to the Court certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the past six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b). Plaintiff submitted the complaint without the filing fees or a completed IFP application and prisoner authorization. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application and prisoner authorization. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application and prisoner authorization, they should be labeled with docket number 23-CV-5354 (LTS).3 No answer shall be required at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

2 The $52.00 administrative fee for filing a civil action does not apply to persons granted IFP status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 3 Plaintiff is cautioned that if a prisoner files a federal civil action or appeal that is dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the dismissal is a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A prisoner who receives three “strikes” cannot file federal civil actions IFP as a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and he must pay the filing fees at the time of filing any new action. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2023 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

(full name of the plaintiff or petitioner applying (each person must submit a separate application)) CV ( ) ( ) -against- (Provide docket number, if available; if filing this with your complaint, you will not yet have a docket number.)

(full name(s) of the defendant(s)/respondent(s)) APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS I am a plaintiff/petitioner in this case and declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and I believe that I am entitled to the relief requested in this action. In support of this application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) (without prepaying fees or costs), I declare that the responses below are true:

1. Are you incarcerated? Yes No (If “No,” go to Question 2.) I am being held at:

Do you receive any payment from this institution? Yes No Monthly amount: If I am a prisoner, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), I have attached to this document a “Prisoner Authorization” directing the facility where I am incarcerated to deduct the filing fee from my account in installments and to send to the Court certified copies of my account statements for the past six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b). I understand that this means that I will be required to pay the full filing fee.

2. Are you presently employed? Yes No If “yes,” my employer’s name and address are:

Gross monthly pay or wages:

If “no,” what was your last date of employment?

Gross monthly wages at the time:

3. In addition to your income stated above (which you should not repeat here), have you or anyone else living at the same residence as you received more than $200 in the past 12 months from any of the following sources? Check all that apply.

(a) Business, profession, or other self-employment Yes No (b) Rent payments, interest, or dividends Yes No (c) Pension, annuity, or life insurance payments Yes No (d) Disability or worker’s compensation payments Yes No (e) Gifts or inheritances Yes No (f) Any other public benefits (unemployment, social security, Yes No food stamps, veteran’s, etc.) (g) Any other sources Yes No

If you answered “Yes” to any question above, describe below or on separate pages each source of money and state the amount that you received and what you expect to receive in the future.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sowell v. Kelly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sowell-v-kelly-nysd-2023.