Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Mixon

84 So. 171, 79 Fla. 420, 1920 Fla. LEXIS 682
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 29, 1920·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

The beneficiary of an insurance certificate brought an action thereon.

The defenses interposed were that the decedent violated the conditions of the certificate rendering it null and void, in that he violated or attempted to violate the laws of Florida by unlawfully assaulting with a deadly weapon, a person who was forced to kill decedent to protect his own life; and that the action was not brought within one year as provided in the certificate which was a contract issued under the laws of Nebraska.

The latter defense was unavailing since it appears that the certificate was delivered in Florida through the officer® of Yellow Pine Camp No. 108, located in this State, thereby making the contract subject to the laws of this State, one of which makes void any contract reducing the statutory limitations for instituting suits. See Chap. 6465, Acts 1913; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber & Mfg. Co., 74 Fla. 130, 77 South. Rep. 168, 250 U. S. , 39 Sup. Ct. Rep.

The first defense above referred to ivas submitted to 17ie jury and there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding adverse to the defendant company.

No material errors of law or procedure appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Mixon, 84 So. 171, 79 Fla. 420, 1920 Fla. LEXIS 682 (Fla. 1920).

84 So. 171 (Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Mixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related