Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel
This text of 153 So. 918 (Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.
No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 So. 918, 228 Ala. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-camp-w-o-w-v-daniel-ala-1934.