Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel

153 So. 918, 228 Ala. 699
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 29, 1934
Docket7 Div. 233.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 So. 918 (Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel, 153 So. 918, 228 Ala. 699 (Ala. 1934).

Opinion

FOSTER, Justice.

The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.

No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Almada v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World
67 P.2d 474 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 918, 228 Ala. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-camp-w-o-w-v-daniel-ala-1934.