Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Batty
This text of 148 So. 811 (Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Batty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
There is no material difference between the contract of insurance interpreted in Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562, and the contract involved in this case, and the majority of the court, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOUDDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., are of the opinion that said case is sound and should not be overruled. On the authority of that case the court did not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrers to defendant’s special plea.
There being no error in the record the judgment is ordered affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 So. 811, 227 Ala. 50, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-camp-w-o-w-v-batty-ala-1933.