Sovereign Camp of W. O. W. v. Carrell

101 So. 914, 20 Ala. App. 340, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 323
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 28, 1924
Docket6 Div. 975.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 So. 914 (Sovereign Camp of W. O. W. v. Carrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sovereign Camp of W. O. W. v. Carrell, 101 So. 914, 20 Ala. App. 340, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 323 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

This was an action to recover $900 alleged to be due the plaintiff (appellee) under a beneficiary certificate or policy of life insurance issued on April 29, 1895, by the defendant (appellant), a fraternal beneficiary association, on th life of Alexander

5. Carrell, a member of the association, the plaintiff being the beneficiary in such certificate, and the alleged member of the association having died September 12,1920.

The trial court gave the general affirmative charge for the defendant, and after verdict the court on motion of the plaintiff set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. This is an appeal from the judgment granting a new trial.

The complaint contained 10 counts. The court sustained demurrers to all of the counts except those numbered 5, 6, and 10. Counts 5 and 6 are substantially in the form prescribed by the Code (Code 1907, § 5382, form 12), and count 10 states fully the plaintiff’s cause of action. The counts to which demurrers were sustained were in the main repetitions of the averments of counts 5 and 6, and we find that counts 5, 6, and 10 contain every material averment contained in counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9, to which demurrers were sustained. The plaintiff, having had the benefit in the counts on which he was put to trial of every material averment in the counts to which demurrers were sustained, cannot complain of any prejudicial injury in the rulings of the court on the demurrers. The pleadings were very voluminous. There were many special pleas, replications, rejoinders, and surrejoinders, and demurrers to practically all. If there were errors in the rulings on pleadings both plaintiff and defendant had the benefit in pleading and evidence of every material issue in the case. We do‘not deem it necessary to specifically treat these pleadings and the rulings thereon, as a general statement of the facts therein disclosed will suffice.

*342 The certificate was issued on the life of A. S. Carrell on April 29,1895, at which time he was 51 years of age. Insured and his son, A. S. Carrell, Jr., the beneficiary in the certificate, paid all assessments for more than 25 years. The certificate contained a provision that payments of assessments should cease after 20 years. Insured continued to pay the assessments after the expiration of 20 years. Many times two or three assessments were paid at a time, and after their due date. The member was never entered on the books suspended but one time, and the clerk of the local camp, finding that he was in error, corrected the error, and never reported the suspension to the Sovereign Clerk. The clerks of the local camp had for several years collected from the member two or three assessments at a time either before or after they were due, and sometimes the camp funds took care of the member’s assessments until they were paid by him. The clerk of the local camp was in the habit of calling on A. S. Carrell, Jr., for his father’s assessments, and Carrell, Jr., paid them whenever the clerk called. The member was an old man 76 years of age, and there is no contention that his assessments were in arrears before July 31, 1920. On August 14, 1920, the clerk called on Carrell, Jr., for the payment' .of assessments, and collected for the assessment made July 1, 1920, and in default July 31, 1920, and also for the August assessment, which paid to August 31. On August 15 the local clerk forwarded to the Sovereign Clerk the assessments of the members for July, and on September 15 forwarded the assessments for August, and the member was reported in good standing. The Sovereign Clerk retained these moneys until December 8, 1920, after proofs of death had been made, after which time the discovery was made that the July and August assessments had been paid on August 14. It had been a custom for the clerk to "forward the assessments between the 10th and 20th of the month, although the laws of the society required that the assessments for the preceding month must be forwarded within the first 5 days of the succeeding month. No objection to this course of dealing of the clerk was made by any of the sovereign officers, but the assessments had always been retained by the Sovereign Clerk. The sovereign officers had not been informed of any custom of the clerk of the local camp to collect dues and assessments after they were delinquent, or of his failure to report as suspended a delinquent member.

The July and August assessments were paid on August 14th. The member was in default on July 31, and under the constitution and laws of the society was automatically suspended on August 1st, and the payment to the clerk on August 14th did not reinstate him; there was no written statement or certificate of health, and he was not in good standing at the time of his death, September 12th. The above matters of defense were set up by appropriate pleas. -The plaintiff sought by appropriate pleading to show that the sovereign officers waived the matters set up in the special pleas by accepting and retaining the money with full knowledge of all the facts, and by the conduct of the clerk of the local camps in the manner in which he customarily made collections and forwarded money. Many of the questions raised in this record have been repeatedly decided by this court and the Supreme Court, and it will not be profitable here to discuss the reasons for such decisions, but it will suffice to state the principle decided and cite one or more authorities. We will discuss more fully the novel questions presented.

The action of the local- clerk was without any binding effect upon the defendant society. Acts 1911, p. 700, § 20; Sov. Camp v. Gay, 207 Ala. 610, 93 So. 559; Yarbrough v. Sovereign Camp, 210 Ala. 188, 97 So. 654; Sovereign Camp v. Ballard, 19 Ala. App. 411, 97 So. 895.

The clerk of a local camp has no authority to waive the time of payment of assessments. Hardy v. Sov. Camp, 17 Ala. App. 53, 81 So. 690; Sov. Camp v. Allen, 206 Ala. 41, 89 So. 58; Sov. Camp v. Eastis, 206 Ala. 49, 89 So. 63; Sov. Camp v. Alford, 206 Ala. 18, 89 So. 528; Sov. Camp v. Maynor, 206 Ala. 176, 89 So. 750; Sov. Camp v. Blanks, 208 Ala. 449, 94 So. 554; Sov. Camp. v. Ballard, 19 Ala. App. 411, 97 So. 895. A member must pay assessments as the law requires, and a habit of a clerk of a local camp to call for payment after delinquent does not bind the Sovereign Camp. A member cannot rely upon a former course of dealing by which his camp or local clerk had been advancing money to pay assessments. He is required to pay according to the laws of the society. Sup. Lodge K. of H. v. Hahn, 43 Ind. App. 75, 84 N. E. 837.

That a local clerk of a mutual benefit association accepted payment of certain assessments after they should have been paid did not constitute a waiver of the right to forfeiture of the contract for failure to pay a subsequent assessment. Hay v. People’s Mutual Benev. Ass’n of North Carolina, 143 N. C. 256, 55 S. E. 623. None of the acts of the clerk of the local camp relied on were acts of the corporation, but were done by a clerk who had no authority to waive the express provisions of its laws. Acts 1911, p. 700,. § 20; Lyon v. Sup. Assembly Royal Society, 153 Mass. 83, 26 N. E. 236.

Under the constitution and laws of the defendant society - the acceptance and retention of the money by the Sovereign Clerk until December 8, 1920, after proofs of death were made and immediately after discovery that the July assessment was not paid until August 14, did not constitute a waiver of the conditions of reinstatement. Sov. Camp v. Gay, supra; Yarbrough v. Sov.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Ex Rel. v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World
180 So. 33 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Cox
127 So. 847 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Carrell
119 So. 640 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 914, 20 Ala. App. 340, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sovereign-camp-of-w-o-w-v-carrell-alactapp-1924.