Southwell v. State

646 So. 2d 847, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 1994 WL 712740
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1994·No. No. 93-1659·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

Southwell appeals his conviction and habitual offender sentence imposed following the revocation of community control he was serving in connection with a conviction for one count of attempted burglary and three counts of resisting arrest with violence. His counsel filed a brief in compliance •with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a thorough review of the record, we affirm Southwell’s judgment and sentence as imposed. However, [848]*848counsel has directed our attention to the lack of written findings setting forth the grounds for revoking community control. Despite acceptable oral findings of the basis for revocation, a trial court must reduce to writing the specific violations found. Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the court for entry of a written revocation order reciting the specific violations found. Boynton v. State, 622 So.2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southwell v. State, 646 So. 2d 847, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 1994 WL 712740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

646 So. 2d 847 (Southwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
695 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)