Southwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southwell v. State

646 So. 2d 847, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 1994 WL 712740

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1659

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 646 So. 2d 847 (Southwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southwell v. State, 646 So. 2d 847, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 1994 WL 712740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

Southwell appeals his conviction and habitual offender sentence imposed following the revocation of community control he was serving in connection with a conviction for one count of attempted burglary and three counts of resisting arrest with violence. His counsel filed a brief in compliance •with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a thorough review of the record, we affirm Southwell’s judgment and sentence as imposed. However, [848]*848counsel has directed our attention to the lack of written findings setting forth the grounds for revoking community control. Despite acceptable oral findings of the basis for revocation, a trial court must reduce to writing the specific violations found. Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the court for entry of a written revocation order reciting the specific violations found. Boynton v. State, 622 So.2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICKLE, Judge.

Southwell appeals his conviction and habitual offender sentence imposed following the revocation of community control he was serving in connection with a conviction for one count of attempted burglary and three counts of resisting arrest with violence. His counsel filed a brief in compliance •with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a thorough review of the record, we affirm Southwell’s judgment and sentence as imposed. However, [848]*848counsel has directed our attention to the lack of written findings setting forth the grounds for revoking community control. Despite acceptable oral findings of the basis for revocation, a trial court must reduce to writing the specific violations found. Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the court for entry of a written revocation order reciting the specific violations found. Boynton v. State, 622 So.2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 So. 2d 847, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12794, 1994 WL 712740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack