Southern Railway Co. v. Ray

77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 12, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 375 (Southern Railway Co. v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Ray, 77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for new trial in this ease; in regard to the admissibility of evidence, refusal to charge, and the charge of the court, are without merit, and do not require elaboration.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Green v. Central R. Co., 130 Ga. 375 (60 S. E. 861), and citations; Southern R. Co. v. Williams, 113 Ga. 335 (38 S. E. 744); Georgia, Florida & Alabama R. Co. v. Summer, 133 Ga. 135 (65 S. E. 381).

Judgment affirmed.

Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
38 S.E. 744 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Greene v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Summer
65 S.E. 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-ray-ga-1913.