Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459
Opinion
1. The grounds of the motion for new trial in this ease; in regard to the admissibility of evidence, refusal to charge, and the charge of the court, are without merit, and do not require elaboration.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Green v. Central R. Co., 130 Ga. 375 (60 S. E. 861), and citations; Southern R. Co. v. Williams, 113 Ga. 335 (38 S. E. 744); Georgia, Florida & Alabama R. Co. v. Summer, 133 Ga. 135 (65 S. E. 381).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Ray, 77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1913).
77 S.E. 375 (Southern Railway Co. v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
38 S.E. 744 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Greene v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Summer
65 S.E. 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)