Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
This text of 77 S.E. 375 (Southern Railway Co. v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The grounds of the motion for new trial in this ease; in regard to the admissibility of evidence, refusal to charge, and the charge of the court, are without merit, and do not require elaboration.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Green v. Central R. Co., 130 Ga. 375 (60 S. E. 861), and citations; Southern R. Co. v. Williams, 113 Ga. 335 (38 S. E. 744); Georgia, Florida & Alabama R. Co. v. Summer, 133 Ga. 135 (65 S. E. 381).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 375, 139 Ga. 437, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-ray-ga-1913.