Greene v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 861, 130 Ga. 375, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 283
Opinion
The evidence in this ease was sufficient to authorize a finding that the fire which injured the plaintiff’s property was communicated from the defendant’s engine; and it was erroneous for the court to grant a nonsuit. See Port Royal Ry. Co. v. Griffin, 86 Ga. 172 (12 S. E. 303) ; Central Ry. Co. v. Trammell, 114 Ga. 312 (40 S. E. 259) ; Southern Ry. Co. v. Herrington, 128 Ga. 438 (57 S. E. 694).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greene v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 60 S.E. 861, 130 Ga. 375, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 283 (Ga. 1908).
60 S.E. 861 (Greene v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fussell v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
48 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Candler v. Automatic Heating Inc.
149 S.E. 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Studdard
130 S.E. 532 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Jarrell v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway
94 S.E. 648 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
77 S.E. 375 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
62 S.E. 1020 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)