Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie

29 S.E. 869, 102 Ga. 313, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 506
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 10, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 869 (Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie, 29 S.E. 869, 102 Ga. 313, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 506 (Ga. 1897).

Opinions

Cobb, J.

According to the principle laid down in the case of Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Company, 79 Ga. 358, which decision was, after review, approved and followed in the case of Morse v. Southern Railway Company, this term, the plaintiff, under the facts as found by the jury, was entitled to recover. An examination of the record fails to disclose any material error committed during the progress of the trial, and as the verdict was reasonable in amount, there is no cause for reversing the decision of the trial judge in refusing -to grant a new .trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
58 S.E. 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Southern Railway Co. v. Barlow
30 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 869, 102 Ga. 313, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-mckenzie-ga-1897.