Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie

29 S.E. 869, 102 Ga. 313, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 506
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 10, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Cobb, J.

According to the principle laid down in the case of Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Company, 79 Ga. 358, which decision was, after review, approved and followed in the case of Morse v. Southern Railway Company, this term, the plaintiff, under the facts as found by the jury, was entitled to recover. An examination of the record fails to disclose any material error committed during the progress of the trial, and as the verdict was reasonable in amount, there is no cause for reversing the decision of the trial judge in refusing -to grant a new .trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie, 29 S.E. 869, 102 Ga. 313, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 506 (Ga. 1897).

29 S.E. 869 (Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
58 S.E. 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Southern Railway Co. v. Barlow
30 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)