Southern Railway Co. v. McIntyre

44 So. 624, 152 Ala. 223, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 72
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJuly 2, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 44 So. 624 (Southern Railway Co. v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. McIntyre, 44 So. 624, 152 Ala. 223, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 72 (Ala. 1907).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.-

Whether the amendment was within the lis pendens, and related back to the original complaint, or not, if properly made as a separate and distinct count, we need not decide, as its being added to the first count as a part thereof rendered the count as amended bad, and subject to the demurrer. A count which unites several distinct causes of action is bad, notwithstanding they might be joined in one complaint in separate and distinct counts. — Iron City Mining Co. v. Hughes, 144 Ala. 608, 42 South. 39; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Shahan, 116 Ala. 302, 22 South. 509; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Cofer, 110 Ala. 491, 18 South. 110; Railroad Co. v. Dusenberry, 94 Ala. 413, 10 South. 274; Offield v. Wabash R. R., 22 Mo. App. 607; S. & M. Ry. v. Buford, 106 Ala. 303, 17 South. 395. The original count charges a trespass upon plaintiff’s land, and the amendment seeks to recover damages for interfering with travel to [227]*227and from the plaintiff’s land by the erection of an embankment (not on plaintiff’s land) npon the street near to the plaintiff’s property. Nor does the complaint aver that plaintiff was in tbe possession of the street.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Tyson, C. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chrysler Corporation v. Hassell
280 So. 2d 102 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)
Globe Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Pappas
122 So. 346 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Graham v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
117 So. 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Alabama Power Co. v. Cornelius
100 So. 207 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
McDougal v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
97 So. 730 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Tennessee, A. & G. R. Co. v. Cavin
77 So. 80 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Sudduth v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
73 So. 28 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
National Baking & Lunch Co. v. Wilson
73 So. 436 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Payne
68 So. 359 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Interstate L. Co. v. Duke
62 So. 845 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 So. 624, 152 Ala. 223, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-mcintyre-ala-1907.