Southern Railway Co. v. Keel

66 S.E. 627, 7 Ga. App. 244, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 616
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 24, 1909·No. 2161·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

There being evidence that, though the dog of the plaintiff was. upon the railroad track for about a minute before it was struck by the train, and was in full view of the engineer for half a mile, the engineer continued the operation of the train at full speed, without sounding any alarm or making any other effort to prevent killing the dog, the jury was authorized to find that the killing was wanton or intentional. The verdict is, therefore, not contrary to law. Columbus R. Co. v. Woolfolk, 128 Ga. 631 (58 S. E. 152, 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1136, 119 Am. St. R. 404). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. Keel, 66 S.E. 627, 7 Ga. App. 244, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

66 S.E. 627 (Southern Railway Co. v. Keel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Moreland
178 S.E.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Skandamis
149 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Winchester
91 S.E. 929 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Harris
91 S.E. 928 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Price
88 S.E. 692 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Parrish
85 S.E. 200 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)