Southern Railway Co. v. Hobbs

49 S.E. 294, 121 Ga. 428, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 179
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by73 cases

This text of 49 S.E. 294 (Southern Railway Co. v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Hobbs, 49 S.E. 294, 121 Ga. 428, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 179 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

■Evans, J.

1. The testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own behalf is to be construed most strongly against him when.it is self-contradictory, vague, or equivocal. W. & A. R. Co. v. Evans, 96 Ga. 481; Freyermuth v. R. Co., 107 Ga. 32 ; Ray v. Green, 113 Ga. 920 ; Farmer v. Davenport, 118 Ga. 289. And he “ is not entitled to a finding in his favor if that version of his testimony the most unfavorable to him shows that the verdict should be against him.” Southern Bank v. Goette, 108 Ga. 796.

2. Applying the rule above stated to the testimony of the plaintiff in the present case, what she swore on the last trial was not materially different from the version she gave of the occurrence under investigation at the trial under review when the case was here at the March term, 1903 (118 Ga. 227) ; and as was then pointed out, she was not, in view of her own sworn admissions, entitled to a recovery. . Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Su v. Perkins
211 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Strickland v. Doran
203 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Durrett v. Farrar
203 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Haley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
202 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Johnson v. Curenton
195 S.E.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Bentley
191 S.E.2d 887 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Fuels, Inc. v. Rutland
179 S.E.2d 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Home Indemnity Company v. Godley
177 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Harper v. Brown
176 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Heaton v. Smith
174 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Boatright v. Rich's, Inc.
173 S.E.2d 232 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Chandler v. Gately
167 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Whisnant v. Whisnant
158 S.E.2d 693 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Bufford v. Bufford
153 S.E.2d 178 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Bearden
151 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Rothberg v. Charles H. Hardin Construction Co.
140 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Bedingfield v. McCullough
128 S.E.2d 374 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Wilson
215 Ga. 746 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Wilson
113 S.E.2d 611 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Fulton v. Chattanooga Publishing Co.
112 S.E.2d 15 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 S.E. 294, 121 Ga. 428, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-hobbs-ga-1904.