Ray v. Green
This text of 39 S.E. 470 (Ray v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a suit to establish a lost deed, a quitclaim deed executed at the same time to the same land conveyed in the alleged lost deed, to the same grantee, and attested by the same witnesses, but executed by a different grantor, is irrelevant and not admissible in evidence.
2. If a plaintiff fails to establish the material allegations,of his petition, or if . his testimony is contradictory and uncertain as to such allegations, the court, on motion to nonsuit, should construe the evidence most strongly against him, and may, if no other testimony appears, be authorized to grant a non-suit ; but if the plaintiff introduce other witnesses whose testimony is sufficient to establish the allegations of the petition, it is error to grant a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 470, 113 Ga. 920, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-green-ga-1901.