Southern Railway Co. v. Dalton Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Southern Railway Co. v. Dalton Telephone Co.

88 S.E. 940, 145 Ga. 189, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 230

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 940 (Southern Railway Co. v. Dalton Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Railway Co. v. Dalton Telephone Co., 88 S.E. 940, 145 Ga. 189, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 230 (Ga. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Where an action for damages was settled by the payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of an agreed sum, and it was further agreed that the defendant would pay “the -costs in said case,” this included all costs in the case, and not merely such as might have been taxed against the defendant if the ease had proceeded to trial and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The legal fees of witnesses summoned by the plaintiff before such settlement formed a part of the costs of the case covered by such agreement, and there was no error in taxing such fees as costs against the defendant, under the settlement made.

(a) Civil Code § 5990, which declares that “No party plaintiff or defendant shall be liable for the costs of any witness of the adverse party, unless such witness was subpoenaed, sworn, and examined on the trial' of said cause (or the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses his cause before trial),” does not control the question here involved. By reason of the settlement there could be no trial. Nevertheless the fees of the witnesses were a part of the costs of the case, which were assumed by the defendant by agreement.

(&) Neither Civil Code § 5992, nor the decision in Holmes v. Huguley, 136 Ga. 758 (72 S. E. 38), militates against the ruling here made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

Where an action for damages was settled by the payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of an agreed sum, and it was further agreed that the defendant would pay “the -costs in said case,” this included all costs in the case, and not merely such as might have been taxed against the defendant if the ease had proceeded to trial and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The legal fees of witnesses summoned by the plaintiff before such settlement formed a part of the costs of the case covered by such agreement, and there was no error in taxing such fees as costs against the defendant, under the settlement made.

(a) Civil Code § 5990, which declares that “No party plaintiff or defendant shall be liable for the costs of any witness of the adverse party, unless such witness was subpoenaed, sworn, and examined on the trial' of said cause (or the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses his cause before trial),” does not control the question here involved. By reason of the settlement there could be no trial. Nevertheless the fees of the witnesses were a part of the costs of the case, which were assumed by the defendant by agreement.

(&) Neither Civil Code § 5992, nor the decision in Holmes v. Huguley, 136 Ga. 758 (72 S. E. 38), militates against the ruling here made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.E. 940, 145 Ga. 189, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-dalton-telephone-co-ga-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack