Southern Railway Co. v. Cunningham

112 Ala. 496
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

It lias come to be settled in this court that a count sounding in damages for personal injuries resulting from the negligence of a person in charge or control of any signal point, locomotive, &c. &c., must allege the name of such person, or that his name is unknown to the plaintiff. — Mobile & Ohio R. R. Co. v. George, 94 Ala. 199 ; McNamara v. Logan, 100 Ala. 187 ; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Bouldin, 110 Ala. 185.

The assignments of demurrer to the third count of the complaint directed against the failure of said count to aver the name of such person, or that his name was unknown to plaintiff should have been sustained. Other grounds of demurrer to the complaint are not insisted on in the brief of appellant’s counsel, and we have not considered them.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. Cunningham, 112 Ala. 496 (Ala. 1895).

112 Ala. 496 (Southern Railway Co. v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
54 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Louisville N. R. Co. v. Sunday
48 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
Hall v. Esslinger
179 So. 639 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Scheuer v. Wise
104 So. 831 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v. Knight
100 So. 233 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Shelby Iron Co. v. Morrow
95 So. 370 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Haley v. Miller
69 So. 564 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. City Stable Co.
119 Ala. 615 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon
114 Ala. 191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)