Southern Pacific Co. v. United States

59 Ct. Cl. 97, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 623, 1924 WL 2388
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Southern Pacific Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 Ct. Cl. 428
United States Court of Claims·Decided January 7, 1924·No. No. B-93·Published

Opinion

[102]*102MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT

The items as to which judgment is awarded were claimed at full commercial rates and the disallowance was protested when payment was made. It was a class of transportation for which plaintiff was entitled to full rates without land-grant deduction.

The items referred to in Finding V were included in a former action dismissed by the court and are res judicata. See section 179, Judicial Code.

As to the items referred to in Finding VII, see cases of Southern Pacific Co., No. 33946, and Western Pacific R. R. Co., this day decided, ante, pp. 36 and 67.

As to the items referred to in Finding IX, see case of Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 52 C. Cls. 468, and Oregon-Washington R. R. & Nav. Co., 54 C. Cls. 131; 255 U. S. 339.

As to the items referred to in Finding X, see also Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 58 C. Cls. 583.

Judgment for plaintiff under Finding VIII, in the sum of $2,024.96, and otherwise, the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 59 Ct. Cl. 97, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 623, 1924 WL 2388 (cc 1924).

59 Ct. Cl. 97 (Southern Pacific Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
52 Ct. Cl. 468 (Court of Claims, 1917)
Atchison v. United States
58 Ct. Cl. 583 (Court of Claims, 1923)