Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. Tasman Services
This text of Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. Tasman Services (Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. Tasman Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 8:21-cv-1510-VMC-CPT
TASMAN SERVICES LLC, et al.,
Defendants. __________________________________/
O R D E R This cause is before the Court sua sponte. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455, a judge must disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). When the proper grounds exist, a judge has an affirmative and self-enforcing obligation to recuse himself of his own accord. United States v. Kelly, 888 F.2d 732, 744 (11th Cir. 1989). In this case, the undersigned presided over a lengthy mediation conference involving the parties. During that conference, the undersigned became privy to confidential information regarding the parties’ respective positions, which might reasonably draw his impartiality into question in any subsequent proceedings in the matter. 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Thus, recusal is warranted. Based upon the foregoing, the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to reassign this case to another magistrate judge by random draw and to provide notice to the parties of the newly designated magistrate judge. SO ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 15th day of August 2022.
Oiciledian dest. HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER P. TUITE United States Magistrate Judge Copies to: Counsel of record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. Tasman Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-owners-insurance-company-v-tasman-services-flmd-2022.