Southern Oregon Co. v. Gage
147 P. 1199, 76 Or. 427, 1915 Ore. LEXIS 296
Opinions
Opinion
The deposit of the amount due for taxes does not, in our opinion, strengthen the plaintiff’s case or differentiate it from Southern Oregon Co. v. Quine, 70 Or. 63 (139 Pac. 332); and the able brief and argument of counsel have failed to convince us that our holding in that case was incorrect. Upon the authority of that case the order of the Circuit Court is affirmed. Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Oregon Co. v. Gage, 147 P. 1199, 76 Or. 427, 1915 Ore. LEXIS 296 (Or. 1915).
147 P. 1199 (Southern Oregon Co. v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spady v. Graves
770 P.2d 53 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
Spady v. Graves
755 P.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. Southern Oregon Co.
244 F. 83 (Ninth Circuit, 1917)