Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Levy Rice Milling Co.

96 S.E. 593, 22 Ga. App. 554, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 600
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1918·No. 9426·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing that the judgment of the court below, sustaining the demurrer to the first count of the declaration and overruling the demurrer to the second count, did not make a final disposition of the case, but that .the case is still pending, the writ assigning error upon the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer to the first count is premature, and must be dismissed. Carhart v. Mackle, ante, 520, and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenlcins and Lulce, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Levy Rice Milling Co., 96 S.E. 593, 22 Ga. App. 554, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 600 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

96 S.E. 593 (Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Levy Rice Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Collins
159 S.E.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
McCorkle v. McLendon
157 S.E.2d 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
McFarland v. Lumpkin
133 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Webb v. Smith
99 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Hill v. Lang
86 S.E.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Stein v. Lazarus
128 S.E. 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Railey v. United Life & Accident Insurance
103 S.E. 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)