McCorkle v. McLendon
This text of 157 S.E.2d 901 (McCorkle v. McLendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judgment sustaining a general demurrer to one count of a two-count petition, and sustaining certain special demurrers to the other count, is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie in a non-equity case. Columbus Bank &c. Co. v. Fryer Chevrolet, 112 Ga. App. 458 (145 SE2d 622); McFarland v. Lumpkin, 108 Ga. App. 370 [476]*476(133 SE2d 117); Webb v. Smith, 96 Ga. App. 68 (99 SE2d 527); Railey v. United Life &c. Ins. Co., 25 Ga. App. 301 (103 SE 184); Stein v. Lazarus, 33 Ga. App. 791 (1) (128 SE 696); Southern Flour &c. Co. v. Levy Bice Milling Co., 22 Ga. App. 554 (96 SE 593); Carhart v. Mackle, 22 Ga. App. 520 (96 SE 591); Johnson v. Henry & Co., 178 Ga. 542 (1) (174 SE 140); Hill v. Lang, 211 Ga. 484 (86 SE2d 498).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E.2d 901, 116 Ga. App. 475, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccorkle-v-mclendon-gactapp-1967.