Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Petty Communications, Inc.

219 S.E.2d 800, 27 N.C. App. 673, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1943
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 3, 1975·No. No. 7518DC620·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

All of appellant’s exceptions relate to the findings of fact set forth in the judgment but the record on appeal does not contain the evidence presented at trial. It is well settled that when the evidence is not included in the record, it will be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to support the findings of fact. Mt. Olive v. Price, 20 N.C. App. 302, 306, 201 S.E. 2d 362, 364 (1973) ; Cobb v. Cobb, 10 N.C. App. 739, 741, 179 S.E. 2d 870, 871 (1971) ; 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 42 at p. 185.

The findings of fact support the trial court’s conclusions of law and adjudication that plaintiff is entitled to recover from appellants the amounts provided in the judgment.

Affirmed.

Judges Vaughn and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Petty Communications, Inc., 219 S.E.2d 800, 27 N.C. App. 673, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1943 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

219 S.E.2d 800 (Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Petty Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re McCarroll
327 S.E.2d 880 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
MATTER OF McCARROLL
327 S.E.2d 880 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.
230 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)