Cobb v. Cobb
179 S.E.2d 870, 10 N.C. App. 739, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715
Opinion
Plaintiff has elected not to bring forward any of the evidence admitted in the custody hearing before Judge Preston. It is presumed therefore that the court’s findings are supported by competent evidence, and the same are conclusive on this appeal. The findings are sufficient to support the judgment. All of the plaintiff’s assignments of error that were properly brought forward on appeal have been carefully considered and are found to be without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cobb v. Cobb, 179 S.E.2d 870, 10 N.C. App. 739, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).
179 S.E.2d 870 (Cobb v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Martin
242 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Goodson v. Goodson
231 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.
230 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Petty Communications, Inc.
219 S.E.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Fellows v. Fellows
219 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Boulware v. Boulware
208 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Town of Mount Olive v. Price
201 S.E.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.
192 S.E.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)