South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

155 S.E. 48, 41 Ga. App. 827, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1109
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1930
Docket20318
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 48 (South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 155 S.E. 48, 41 Ga. App. 827, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1109 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

A. South, employee, filed a claim against Yancey Brothers, employer, and the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, insurance carrier, for compensation. This is the second appearance of the case in this court, and a change in a former award is being asked by the claimant, on account of a change in his condition. After hearing the testimony Commissioner Whitaker, who heard the case, wrote: “The medical testimony submitted by him [claimant] indicates that he has more than a fifty per cent, permanent disability. The medical testimony submitted by the employer and insurance carrier and that of a disinterested physician, Dr. C. W. Boberts, who had previously examined the claimant,.is to the effect that there had been no change in his physical condition since their last examination.” Having determined, from the evidence, that there had been no change in the condition of the claimant, the sole commissioner denied additional compensation. The claimant then appealed to the full commission, which, after considering the case, affirmed the award of the sole commissioner and also denied additional compensation. Claimant then appealed to the superior court of Fulton county, and that court affirmed the award of the full commission. “ On an appeal to the superior court from an award made by the industrial commission the judge of the superior court has no discretion to set aside the award, but where the award is sustained by some legally competent evidence, it is his duty, unless some error of law appears, to affirm the award.” Blanchard v. Savannah River Lumber Co., 40 Ga. App. 416 (2) (149 S. E. 793). There is “some legally competent evidence” in this case to sustain the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Lulte, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. U. S.. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
186 S.E.2d 784 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Malcom v. Sudderth
106 S.E.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
LaBranche v. American Automobile Insurance
78 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Travelers Insurance v. Wofford
58 S.E.2d 853 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fried
12 S.E.2d 406 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Ingram v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
10 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Dorminy v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
6 S.E.2d 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Georgia Power & Light Co. v. Patterson
166 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Crosby
162 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.E. 48, 41 Ga. App. 827, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-v-indemnity-insurance-co-of-north-america-gactapp-1930.