South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Thompson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Thompson

257 S.E.2d 747, 273 S.C. 569, 1979 S.C. LEXIS 437

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedAugust 27, 1979

Docket21042

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 257 S.E.2d 747 (South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Thompson, 257 S.E.2d 747, 273 S.C. 569, 1979 S.C. LEXIS 437 (S.C. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal is -taken by the South Carolina Department of Social Services from a lower court order relieving respondent from a portion of the terms of a default judgment which had established paternity of and a support obligation for two minor children, Sarah and Shirley Ann McCall. We reverse and reinstate the original judgment.

S. C. Code Section 15-27-130 (1976) provides an exclusive remedy for relief from judgments and orders. Brock v. Brock, 225 S. C. 261, 81 S. E. (2d) 898 (1954). To obtain relief under this section the moving party must demonstrate (1) that the judgment or order was taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect and (2) that he has a meritorious defense. Univ. of South Carolina Federal Credit Union v. Moye, 270 S. C. 199, 241 S. E. (2d) 558 (1978); McInerny v. Toler, 260 S. C. 382, 196 S. E. (2d) 122 (1973) ; Edwards v. Ferguson, 254 S. C. 278, 175 S. E. (2d) 224 (1970).

The lower court expressly found that respondent had a meritorious defense of res judicata as to the paternity of Shirley Ann McCall; however, it also went *571 on to find a lack of excusable neglect. Additionally, there was no finding of mistake, inadvertence, or surprise. Res judicata is an affirmative defense and must be pleaded to be established. S. C. Dept. of Social Services v. Foggie, 271 S. C. 109, 245 S. E. (2d) 423 (1978); S. C. Code Section 15-13-720 (1976). It would then follow that the lower court lacked a basis for relieving respondent from the default judgment determining his paternity of and support obligation for Shirley Ann McCall.

The lower court’s Order relieving respondent from the default judgment determining his paternity of and support obligation for Shirley Ann McCall is reversed and the original Order is hereby reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This appeal is -taken by the South Carolina Department of Social Services from a lower court order relieving respondent from a portion of the terms of a default judgment which had established paternity of and a support obligation for two minor children, Sarah and Shirley Ann McCall. We reverse and reinstate the original judgment.

S. C. Code Section 15-27-130 (1976) provides an exclusive remedy for relief from judgments and orders. Brock v. Brock, 225 S. C. 261, 81 S. E. (2d) 898 (1954). To obtain relief under this section the moving party must demonstrate (1) that the judgment or order was taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect and (2) that he has a meritorious defense. Univ. of South Carolina Federal Credit Union v. Moye, 270 S. C. 199, 241 S. E. (2d) 558 (1978); McInerny v. Toler, 260 S. C. 382, 196 S. E. (2d) 122 (1973) ; Edwards v. Ferguson, 254 S. C. 278, 175 S. E. (2d) 224 (1970).

The lower court expressly found that respondent had a meritorious defense of res judicata as to the paternity of Shirley Ann McCall; however, it also went *571 on to find a lack of excusable neglect. Additionally, there was no finding of mistake, inadvertence, or surprise. Res judicata is an affirmative defense and must be pleaded to be established. S. C. Dept. of Social Services v. Foggie, 271 S. C. 109, 245 S. E. (2d) 423 (1978); S. C. Code Section 15-13-720 (1976). It would then follow that the lower court lacked a basis for relieving respondent from the default judgment determining his paternity of and support obligation for Shirley Ann McCall.

The lower court’s Order relieving respondent from the default judgment determining his paternity of and support obligation for Shirley Ann McCall is reversed and the original Order is hereby reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 S.E.2d 747, 273 S.C. 569, 1979 S.C. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-carolina-department-of-social-services-v-thompson-sc-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack