Sorto v. Polk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7063
JULIO ZELAYA SORTO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MARVIN POLK, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. P. Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00113-WLO)
Submitted: August 18, 2006 Decided: September 12, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Julio Zelaya Sorto seeks to appeal the order of the
magistrate judge deeming Sorto’s response to a Roseboro* notice
deficient and striking the response without prejudice. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Sorto seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975).
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sorto v. Polk (Sorto v. Polk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.