Sorto v. Polk

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 12, 2006·No. 06-7063·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7063

JULIO ZELAYA SORTO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN POLK, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. P. Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00113-WLO)

Submitted: August 18, 2006 Decided: September 12, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Julio Zelaya Sorto seeks to appeal the order of the

magistrate judge deeming Sorto’s response to a Roseboro* notice

deficient and striking the response without prejudice. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Sorto seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975).

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorto v. Polk, (4th Cir. 2006).

Sorto v. Polk (Sorto v. Polk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related