Sorto v. Polk

200 F. App'x 212

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Julio Zelaya Sorto seeks to appeal the order of the magistrate judge deeming Sorto’s response to a Roseboro

* notice deficient and striking the response without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Sorto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975).